| 교수명 : 원숙연 개설학기 : 2004년 2학기 행정학 전공 |
| |
| 강의개요 | |
|
비교여성정책연구(Comparative Gender Policy Regimes )
학수번호: PA716요일-교시: 목 2-3
담당교수: 원숙연(사회과학대학 행정학전공)
포스코관 501호(3277- 4101)
sywon@ewhawoman.or.kr/home.ewhawoman.or.kr/~Won
강의목표
우리나라의 국가정책은 젠더관계를 어떻게 규정․규율하고 있으며 이는 성인지적 관점을 통해 볼 때 어느 지점에 위치하고 있을까? 이러한 질문에 대한 답을 구하기 위한 선행작업으로 다양한 국가들간의 비교가 중요한 의미를 갖는다. 이를 위해 젠더-정책레짐(gender policy regimes)이라는 개념적 분석틀을 중심으로 각국을 범주화하고 이들의 특성을 비교분석한다. 즉 특정 국가의 정책 및 정책 논리 속에서 공통적으로 발견되는 젠더-이데올로기, 젠더관행 및 양성간의 의무와 권리에 대한 정향성을 포괄하는 젠더-정책레짐이라는 분석틀을 적용해 서구 각 국가의 정책을 조망하고 이를 통해 우리나라의 정책을 대상으로 소위 한국젠더-정책레짐(the Korean Gender Policy Regime)의 위치와 성격을 밝힐 수 있는 기초를 제공하는 것을 본 과목의 목표로 한다.
교과서
별도편집교재
과제
Mid -Term Paper: Research Proposal(Due: 10.21.)
Term-Paper: Research Paper(Due: 12.11.)
평가
Mid-Term Paper: 20%
Term -Paper: 50%
Participation and Presentation: 30%
교과내용 및 일정
1. Introduction (9.2.)
2. Welfare Regimes as a Gender-Neutral Framework for Comparative Studies of State Policy? (9.9.)
* 1) Gosta Esping-Andersen(1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, London: Polity Press, pp. 18-34, 221-229.
2) Gosta Esping-Andersen(2002), "A New Gender Contract", in Esping-Andersen et. al. (eds.), Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 68-95.
3) Abrahamson, P. (1999), "The Welfare Modeling Business", Social Policy and Administration, 33(4):394-415.
3. Gender Policy Regime (Gender welfare Regimes) as an Alternative (9.16/23/30)
A. Feminist Critiques of Welfare Regimes
1) O, Connor, J.(1993), "Gender. Class and Citizenship in the Comparative Analysis of Welfare State Regimes: Theoretical and Methodological Issues", British Journal of Sociology, 44(3): 501-518.
2) Pfau-Effinger, B. (1998), "Gender Cultures and the Gender Arrangements-A Theoretical Framework for Cross-National Gender Research", presented paper in SPA.
* 3) Willams, F. (1989), "Feminist Critiques of the Welfare State", in Social Policy : A Critical Introduction, Issues of Race, Gender and Class, pp. 41-86.
* 4) 조형 외(2004), 「여성의 시민적 권리와 사회정책」, pp. 39-82.
* 5) 쿨라빅(2000), “근대화론에서 무권주의에 이르는 복지국가의 이론들”, 테레사 쿨라빅 외 , 복지국가의 여성정책, 새물결, pp. 25-51.
B. Leading an Alternative Framework (strategy) for Comparative Study of Gender Regimes
* 1) Lewis, J. (1992), "Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes", Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3): 159-173.
2) Sainsbury, D. (1996), "Gendering Dimensions of Welfare States", in Sainsbury, D. Gender, Equality, Welfare States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-46.
3) Bussemaker, J. and Kersbergen, K. (1996), "Gender and Welfare States : Some Theoretical Reflections", in Sainsbury, D. Gendering welfare States, London: Sage, pp. 8-25.
*4) Adams, J. and Padamsee, T. (2001), "Signs and Regimes: Rereading Feminist Work on Welfare States", Social Politics, Spring: 1-23.
5) Daly, M. (1996), "Comparing Welfare States : Towards a Gender Friendly Approach", in Sainsbury, D., Gendering welfare States, London: Sage, pp. 101- 117.
6) O' Connor, et. al., (1999), "Gendering Theories and Comparisons of Welfare States", in O'Connor, et. al., Sates, Markets, Families, pp. 1-42.
7) O'Connor, J. (1996), "From Women as an Issue to Gender As a Dimension of Analysis, Current Sociology, 44(2): 101-108.
* 8) 원숙연(2003), 젠더와 국가정책의 역학: 젠더-정책레짐 정립을 위한 이론적 탐색, 「한국행정학보」, 37(2):
* 9) 앤 올로프(2000), “젠더와 시민의 사회적 권리: 젠더관계와 복지국가에 대한 비교분석”, 테레사 쿨라빅외, 복지국가의 여성정책, 새물결, pp.53-87.
4. Liberal Gender Policy Regimes(10.7/14)
* 1) O'Connor et. al.(1999), "Liberalism, Gender and Social Policy", in O'Connor, et. al., States, Markets, Families, pp. 43-65.
*2) O'Connor. et. al. (1999), "Liberalism, Gender Policy Logics and Mobilisation", in O'Connor, et. al., States, Markets, Families, pp.186-222.
*3) Gornick, J. (1999), "Gender Equality in the Labour Market", in Sainsbury, D. (eds.), Gender and Welfare State Regimes, pp.210-242.
4) O'Connor, J. (1999), "Employment Equality Strategies in Liberal Welfare States", in Sainsbury, D. (eds.), Gender and Welfare State Regimes, pp. 47-74.
*5) O'Connor, et. al. (1999), "The Labour Market and Social Policy", in O'Connor, et. al., States, Markets, Families, pp. 66-108.
6) Sharp, R. and Broomhill, R. (2002), "Budgeting for Equality: The Australian Experience", Feminist Economics, 8(1):25-47.
7) Himmelweit, S. (2002), "Making Visible the Hidden Economy: The Case for Gender-Impact Analysis of Economy Policy", Feminist Economics, 8(1):49-70.
5. Conservative Gender Policy Regimes (10.21)
*1) Bussemaker, J. and Kersbergen, K. (1999), "Contemporary Social-Capitalist Welfare States and Gender Inequality", in Sainsbury D. (eds.), Gender and Welfare State Regimes, pp. 15-46.
*2) Pfau-Effinger, B. (1999), "The Modernization of Family and Motherhood in Western Europe", in Crompton, R. (eds.), Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment, pp.60-79.
3) Trzcinski, E. (2000), "Family Policy in Germany: A Feminist Dilemma?", Feminist Economics, 6(1):21-44.
4) Crompton, R. (2000), "Gender, Family and Employment in Comparative Perspective: The Realities and Representations of Equal Opportunities in Britain and France", Journal of European Social Policy, 10(4):334-348.
5) Laufer, J. (1998), Equal Opportunity between Men and Women: The Case of France, Feminist Economics, 4(1):53-69.
6. Mid-term Paper(research proposal)Presentation(10.28)
7. Social-Democratic Gender Policy Regimes(11.4/11)
*1) Sainsbury, D. (1999), "Gender and Social-Democratic Welfare States", in Sainsbury, D. (eds.), Gender and Welfare State Regimes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 75-114.
*2) DllingsAEter, A. (1999), "Dual Breadwinners between State and Market", in Crompton, R. (eds.), Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment, pp. 40-59.
3) Ka, L. (2001), "Chinese Perception of the Scandinavian Social Policy Model", Social Policy and Administration, 35(3):321-340.
4) Hass, L. and Hwang, P. (2000), " Programs and Policies Promoting Women's Economic Equality and Men's Sharing of Child care in Sweden", in Hass, L., Hwang, P., and Russell, G. (eds.), Organizational Change and Gender Equity: International Perspectives on Fathers and Mothers at the Workplace, London: Sage, pp. 133-153.
5) Bjornberg, U. (2002), "Ideology and Choice between Work and Care: Swedish Family Policy for Working Parents", Critical Social Policy, 22(1): 35-52.
6) Bjornberg, U.(2000), "Equality and Backlash: Family, Gender and Social Policy in Sweden, in Hass, L., Hwang, P., and Russell, G. (eds.), Organizational Change and Gender Equity: International Perspectives on Fathers and Mothers at the Workplace, London: Sage,pp. 57-75.
8. Women's Bureaux in Gender Policy Regimes (11.18/25)
*1) Introduction for Comparison
Stetson D. and Mazur, A. (1995), "Introduction", in Stetson, D. and Mazur, A. (eds.), Comparative State Feminism, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 1-21.
2) USA
Stetson, D. (1995), "The Oldest Women's policy Agency: The Women's Bureau in the United States", in Stetson, D. and Mazur, A. (eds.), Comparative State Feminism, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 254-271.
3) U.K.
Lovenduski, J. (1995), "An Emerging Advocate: The Equal Opportunities Commission in Great Britain", in Stetson, D. and Mazur, A. (eds.), Comparative State Feminism, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp.114-131.
4) Australia
Sawer, M. (1995), "Femocrats in Glass Towers? The Office of the Status of Women in Australia", in Stetson, D. and Mazur, A. (eds.), Comparative State Feminism, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 22-39.
5) Germany
Ferree, M.(1995), "Making Equality: The Women's Affairs Offices in the Federal Republic of Germany", in Stetson, D. and Mazur, A. (eds.), Comparative State Feminism, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 95-113.
6) Sweden
Elman, R. (1995), "The State's Equality for Women: Sweden's Equality Ombusman", in Stetson, D. and Mazur, A. (eds.), Comparative State Feminism, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp.237-253.
*7) A Typology of Women's Bureaux
Mazur, A. and Stetson, D. (1995), "The Case for State Feminism", in Stetson, D. and Mazur, A. (eds.), Comparative State Feminism, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 272-291.
9. Towards the Korean Gender Policy Regime(12.2)
|
|
